I have heard it called confidential, but for the life of me I can't fathom why. Maybe like the Social Security number, some people are just touchy about such things.
On that subject, I recently got a message on MLS pointing out that the Individual Ordinance Summary is for handing out to a member, but the Membership record is NOT. But again, for the life of me, I haven't yet discerned any difference between them. And I certainly can't figure out any moral justification for keeping information on people that they aren't permitted to access. Does anybody have any insight on this? Tom On 5/22/07, Slide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/07, Bill Pringle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The CSV files from MLS also contain the membership IDs, which is a > permanent identification. That is what you can use and never > change. The internal ID value seems fairly stable, but I only use it > to match up the HT/VT and Organization records with the Membership > records. I have defined an auxiliary file that I use for my > program. This file contains the membership ID along with any other > information I want to keep (like cell phones and e-mail for each > member) By comparing the auxiliary file with the import, I can tell > who is new and who is no longer on the records. > Isn't the MRN confidential information though? That is why I wasn't storing it or using it. slide _______________________________________________ Ldsoss mailing list Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
-- Tom Haws 480-201-5476 Have a beautiful day.
_______________________________________________ Ldsoss mailing list Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
