> At 11:14 AM 1/13/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm back home, and looking to rsync my site to SF, but I have a problem
> >with the "downloadable files". While I agree these should go in the FTP
> >area, my current site is not really setup to support this. I could
rather
> >quickly make links in the FTP area to files in the web area, or I can
> >restructure things for the new SF structure (which will have to happen
> >anyway, longterm). I also have the issue of my several mirror sites to
> >deal with...they will need to be able to correctly sync with the new site
> >structure (rsync will help a lot in providing options for this).
> >
> >So, what's the preference? A quick upload that doesn't fit the SF
> >structure followed by a re-orginazation of my content, or re-org then
upload?
>
> Charles,
> I'd prefer quick. We can fix things later. Also, we may want to change the
> SF structure later anyway. A lot depends on what actually works. Theory is
> great, but until we start integrating things we wont know what the
problems
> with the current structure are.
I'll try to get content uploaded this weekend, maybe even today. Right now,
I'm doing an emergency web-server install at our SanFrancisco location,
which has some spare bandwidth.
Check out:
http://www.newtek.com
to test your patience. Put yourself in the 'saint' catagory if you let the
entire page load, and that's just the splash screen.
This is what happens when you co-lo a web server requiring high bandwidth
with 18 other server machines, all sharing the same T1. Of course, the
price was pretty low...
NOTE: I warned of exactly this result prior to installing the server
on-site, but as usual, no-one listens until after the fact...
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
