> Any thoughts or ideas? I'm thinking that trimming the fat off of this
> stuff, combined with UPX, might be enough for us to go glibc 2.1.x or even
> 2.2.x for base router images. At least then, it would be easier to
> transition from the basics to the fun stuff.
I think glibc 2.1.x or 2.2.x on a floppy with a 2.4 kernel should be the
target, until we find some practical reason why this just can't be done...
With the numbers I've seen for 2.4 kernel and glibc (especially once glibc
gets stripped of debug info) seem to indicate there's no reason we can't
make this work, maybe even on a 1.4Meg floppy (although I'd be happy with a
1.68 meg image).
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
