On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 00:24, Greg Morgan wrote: > Lynn Avants wrote: > > > > > I had a similar thought about a year ago and ran into > > one snag that I never could figure out. We could use to=20 > > some degree the SF SQL server. When an image/package=20 > > is 'selected', how do we generate it w/o an external server? > > I just checked in what I have been working on. Gasp. My first use of > CVS and I had unintended consequences. The ideas I have been thinking > of have matured dramatically after putting them to text. I think what I > did at > >http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/dr_kludge/GilaMonster/GilaMonster/ > > was to abstract all the data that is required to be configured. If that > was done successfully, then I don't think you'd have to have a live > system to work on while making changes to a LEAF configuration. Yes, a > live system would be required to build the final .lrp files and image.
Very neat. Very complete. Do you have any test data (other than that in the comments) to fill this table? Especially GMPackageVariables and GMPackageVariableValues. This would be very helpful in what I am doing now to attempt to define a hierarchical config-db for the leaf box itself. I also like how we both came up against firewalling and ipsec and put it off till later! Those are definitely the two hardest problems! Microsoft has demonstrated how difficult it is to come up with comprehensible GUIs for these two items (by failing to do so). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
