Hi! > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The exceptions are (IIRC) the kernel. > > That is a problem then, and we need to address it.
I still say it is a non-existing problem, rather a stubborness. > > Do the guys at sourceforge.net really want to implode? > > It's not the SF staff. It is the FSF. I know, but if enforced, sf.net _will_ implode due to the sudden increase of needless source packages, some may even be other sf.net projects. This is insane!!! > > Richard Stallman's explanation: > > > http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/15/0331201&from=rss > "Under GPL version 2, distributors who > release binaries > through a network server have to release the > corresponding source code in the same way. This > requirement is the only way to assure that > users can get > the source, and the that it is the right source." Bah! again, nonsense! It makes sense for the derivative kind of programs, those that require tons and tons of other libs, for example MythTv, Mplayer or VideoLanClient. But again, I still think we (Bering-uClibc) are exempt. > > Everyone, > We need to release source tarballs in the SF FRS with our binaries. Let's be reasonable about that, shall we? Luis Correia Bering uClibc Team Member PGP Fingerprint: BC44 D7DA 5A17 F92A CA21 9ABE DFF0 3540 2322 21F6 Key Server: http://pgp.mit.edu ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
