Hi ERich; Am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011, 00:54:52 schrieb Erich Titl: > KP > > on 05.07.2011 20:07, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > For 4.1 the following open issues come to my mind: > > - webconf 1.2 doubles traceroute and ping > > I am aware of that, have not found the time to address it completely. I > would opt to make it standard in webconf 1.2, thus move it out of lwp.
Agree, traceroute and ping are now installed by default (busybox apps), so it won't generate an error (as before, where traceroute was an lrp). > Also I would like to move the files for webconf-expert to the standard > package. ok. > As webconf is directly dependent on haserl and nothing else is, and as > the webconf files have a direct dependency on a certain version of > haserl I would suggest to also include haserl in webconf. This would > IMHO make the packaging cleaner. For the time being you are right, and I do not think it will change in the medium future, but I vote to keep them seperated - that's something I've learned from linux distro's like debian, esp. while reading about the hell to package java apps, where dependend libs/programs are packaged with a specific application. To be as much as possible modular was one Bering-uClibc target at the start. > > - Trac ticket #55 (ipsec makes no route?) > > I _guess_ this is still the same problem with iproute2. There are still > instances of ifconfig in the code. But we still do provide ifconfig. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
