The situation has improved a bit.
The main symptom now seems to be that
the command netstat -an | grep 53 yields
udp    0    0 0.0.0.0:53 0.0.0.0:*
so it does not look like the internal iface (192.168.1.254) is being 
bound to port 53.

ps grep dnscache yields
1026 daemon  S  /usr/bin/dnscache

Any thing special to set up the binding for dns?  This is the stock 
Dachstein RC2, except for changes mentioned below.

Thanks to all for help so far.  I have fixed one of the vexation by the 
time-proven method:
"When configuration won't work start replacing components" .
I began with the natsemi.o module, which had given me trouble on my 
previous firewall incarnation - Dach-pppoe.

THis time around, I was getting good traffic through the external i/f so 
I assumed the driver was fine.  When I replaced the driver module (for 
my FA311 boards) with a newer natsemi.o, which I had compiled in Dec. 
2001 (found it on a floppy), backed up the ram disk & rebooted, now all 
is working -- internal + external.  But *only* for 192.168.1.1.  A 
second windoze box (gets 192.168.1.2) is configured exactly as the 
first, but can't pass traffic. Tried pinging an IP addr, and it times out.

dmesg outputs a lot of identical lines like:
Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 10.1.20.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 
L=328 S=0x0 I=414nn F=0x000 T=255 (#8)



I am running with a hand-configured DNS on the win2k, but I will try to 
let the firewall serve up DNS..
If not, a newer version of Dach might be in  order.


Brad Fritz wrote:

> On 2002-07-22 at 15:48 Dr. Richard W. Tibbs wrote:
> 
> 
>>I booted up using a vanilla Dachstein RC2 floppy ( a little old, 
>>I know) and everything on the firewall seems fine:
>>
> 
> Assuming you mean Dachstein-PR2, is there a reason you are using
> a pre-release version of Dachstein?  There were bugs in it that
> were fixed in later releases[1].  IIRC, the way dnscache was setup
> was changed too; /etc/dnscache.conf was eliminated in favor of the
> /etc/dnscache/env directory.  It's been awhile, and I don't remember
> the specifics, but think there were functional changes in the way
> dnscache was setup too.
> 
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:07:28 EDT Dr. Richard W. Tibbs wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Which package are you using?  JNilo's doesn't contain any
>>>/etc/dnscache.conf; rather, it looks like Erich's table (below).
>>>
> 
> Is it the stock Dachstein RC2 dnscache?
> 
> 
>>>I remain convinced that something is not configured properly with
>>>dnscache and/or it is *not* actually running . . .
>>>
>>>
>>This is my guess since nslookup from the win2k box times out.
>>
> 
> Since this is dachstein (with netstat included), what does
> 
>    netstat -an | grep 53
> 
> say?  You should see (at least) a match for udp port 53 on
> 192.168.1.254 like this:
> 
>    udp        0      0 192.168.1.254:53        0.0.0.0:*
> 
> If not, what does
> 
>   ps | grep [d]nscache
> 
> say?  There should be a match for /usr/bin/dnscache , probably
> running as the user "dnscache".  On my Dachstein-CD box, the
> process is:
> 
>   1002 dnscache S    /usr/bin/dnscache
> 
> If dnscache is running and bound to 192.168.1.254:53, you might
> try setting "nameserver 192.168.1.254" in /etc/resolv.conf on
> the firewall and verify that name resolution on the firewall
> still works.  (Try pinging an internet host by name.)  If it
> doesn't, either dnscache is not setup correctly or maybe
> something is blocking name requests to the root servers upstream,
> although that seems unlikely.  I'd also recommend using a newer
> version of Dachstein if you don't have a reason for using the
> pre-release.
> 
> --Brad
> 
> [1] http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/cstein/files/diskimages/dachstein/changes.txt
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
> SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
> 





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to