Scott,

On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:25:36 EST Scott Merrill wrote:

> On Friday 17 January 2003 10:16 am, you wrote:
> > Never seen those error messages before.  Something is defintely wrong,
> > but I'm not sure what.  You might get better help on the orinoco-user
> > list:
> >   http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=orinoco-users
> >
> > or in the samba wireless archives:
> >   http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> That's my next stop.

David Gibson, the orinoco_cs author, participates regularly on
orinoco-users, so you're likely to get good help there.  There
is also a recent thread 

  http://sf.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1517538&forum_id=11432

that references the same error message you reported.


> > > I switched cards, putting the LEAF/Bering card into my laptop, and vice
> > > versa; but the problem remained -- a moderate period of inactivity caused
> > > the system to think that the card was no longer there.
> >
> > Which version of orinoco_cs does the Bering system use?  Does the
> > notebook use orinoco_cs drivers?  (Note:  you could also try the
> > wavelan2_cs binary driver from Lucent.)
> 
> I'm not sure what module version LEAF/Bering uses in the pcmcia_orinoco.lrp 
> package.
> The laptop is using orinoco_cs, from Debian's woody pcmcia-cs package.

Look in /var/log/kern.log after a pcmcia restart.  When the drivers
are insmodded they spit out a bunch of debugging info, including the
driver version.  (If you post to orinoco-users you'll want to include
those log messages.)  Most likely you have 0.09b on Bering and 0.11b
on woody.  That is a combo that worked for me for several months with
firmware 8.10 in the debian (sarge) card and 6.16 on the Bering card.
 

> > > The laptop does not produce these error messages, so I'm fairly confident
> > > that the problem is isolated to the LEAF/Bering box.  This could mean
> > > that I've got a screwy configuration somehow, or that I've got a hardware
> > > problem (most likely a flakey ISA-to-PCMCIA adapter?).
> >
> > What make and model is the ISA-to-PCMCIA bridge?
> 
> Vadem VG-469 ISA-to-PCMCIA, just like the one you report success with.

Did you have to add

  PCIC_OPTS=i365_base=0x3e2

to /etc/default/pcmcia like I did?  Since your setup is so similar to
mine, I will send you copies of my config files and startup messages
offlist so you can use them for reference.


> > You may also want to try the 2.4.20 version of the kernel,
> > pcmcia_orinoco.lrp, and modules.lrp since that will get you up
> > to the 0.11b version of orinoco_cs.
> 
> If that'll fix it, so be it.  But Matt Schalit's recent explanation of the 
> hoops to jump through in order to enjoy 2.4.20 gives me the willies!  =)

IIRC, Matt built his from scratch, but that's not really necessary.
Just grab the kernel (linux-2.4.20.upx), pcmcia_orinoco.lrp and
modules.lrp from

  http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/contrib/2.4.20/

and use them instead of the versions in the 1.0-stable image.  You will
need to rename "linux-2.4.20.upx" to "linux" and "pcmcia_orinoco.lrp"
to "pcmcia.lrp".  You _may_ also need the wireless.lrp and iptables.lrp
packages from that directory, but I'm not positive.  Then use modules
from

  http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.20/

Just a thought...it's certainly easier than compiling your own kernel
and pcmcia modules to upgrade orinoco_cs. :)  And you'll probably
get better support on orinoco-users if you're using a newer driver
version.

--Brad



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will
allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your 
clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. 
Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to