* Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:03:16:06:15:09-0600] scribed: > Michael D Schleif wrote: <snip />
> | Thank you, all of you, for your continued efforts with LEAF. > | > | P.S., Please, Charles, keep me in the loop on all updates you make to > | Bering-CD. It looks like, for now, I can do without Bering-uClibc. > > I may be swithcing to Bering-uClibc...the libc used by Dachstein and Bering > is getting pretty long in the tooth (several newer programs won't even > compile against it), and it seems to make more sense to switch to uClibc > rather than a current glibc for something like a firewall. > > Regardless, there likely won't be a lot of activity on my Bering-CD. Will you upgrade Bering-CD to Bering-uClibc? Will you continue to use a CD-based system? I am curious about how to move to Bering-uClibc with a CD-based system. My systems do not have memory limitations; but, I do want to move toward the leading edge of LEAF development. What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
