I "guessed" it.  Bering 1.2 allowed masklen, but Bering 2.3 used
netmask only.  I figured couldn't hurt to try and switch notations.

I suspect other ppl might assume like I did that the masklen notation still worked.
Tha'ts why I posted this little experience of mine.

--jsl


Arne Bernin wrote:

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 14:12 -0700, Julie S. Lin wrote:
Hi

I had the same problem, I configured my three cards in /etc/network/interfaces as follows but I got ifup -a error "Don't seem to have all the variables for eth0, eth1, eth1"
when I used masklen notation, if I use netmask, it works!


please use netmask. it seems that masklen is not supported, where did
you read about it (is it in the example /etc/network file ?)

auto eth1   (internal interface)
iface eth1 inet static
   address 192.168.0.1
   #masklen 24
    netmask 255.255.255.0
   broadcast 192.168.0.255


Julie

--arne




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/

Reply via email to