On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <e4ad08e2-540d-4068-a5d5-5e0aa6a0b...@noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes: > >> Astronomers on this list have demonstrated profligate willingness to >> entertain diverse options. > > As has the unworthy (in your opinion) computer geeks.
Um - one can be an astronomer and a computer geek. You want geeks? We got geeks of cosmic proportions. It is the timelords who appear to find this conversation unworthy. This isn't a two-sided conversation, but rather three-sided (at least). > What happend to the "you tell us leap seconds 10 years in advance" proposal > for instance ? Still on the table, waiting for the timelords to sit down. It's remarkable how unproductive a discussion becomes when one party spends a decade attempting repeatedly to cram through the same insipid proposal. Rob _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
