Tony Finch wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Rob Seaman wrote: >> >> Even if one-a-day is introduced this would be the case. > > Er what?! Days won't become 25 hours long until well over a hundred million > years in the future!
In context my statement was: "By comparison, a leap second is introduced by a central authority and is ignored by microwave ovens and set-top boxes and in general most clocks worldwide. Even if one-a-day is introduced this would be the case." I was discussing one-a-day leap-seconds, that is, when the length-of-day becomes 86401 SI-seconds. By comparison, leap-hour-proxies like rubber timezones would originate from no central authority and could be ignored by no stake-holders for any purposes. This is also a rhetorical discussion. The problems resulting from embargoing leap seconds would start immediately. Astronomers are just the canaries in the coal mine. Rob
_______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs