In message <6d097a07-04ec-4ace-ad99-4c647ab22...@noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
>In context my statement was: > > "By comparison, a leap second is introduced by a central >authority [...] What "authority" would that be, and what powers would it have ? Remember: it's called "a recommendation" for a good reason. I don't need to remind you, that nobody would be surprised if the vote fails in ITU-R and USA then throw the toys out of the pram and declares that they will discontinue leap-seconds anyway. Heck, we had casually mentioned to Fox News, at the right time in the "patriotic fever" after 2001, that leap-seconds were "french" they would have been gone for 9 years now already, unless somebody at NIST were quick enough to rename them "freedom seconds" Yeah, it wouldn't be pretty, but neither are engineering drawings in two units of measurements. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
