----- Original Message ----- > Which would have been the case whoever bought the club from the > administrators - correct?
Generally correct in meaning I think, except that this time the club itself has been closed down and a new one formed as I understand it.. > It was the process of going into admin which left the 'golden share' up in > the air? I think it was the proposal to sell the assets of the 1920 club to a new company which has brought about this situation. I'm not sure if the Golden share has to be transferred if the "company" merely changes ownership (perhaps you need some sort of approval as opposed to a transfer) but I suspect that this is of a different mangnitude. I really don't have sufficient depth of knowledge to say definitely. > Luckily the league have transferred this golden share to new owners of all > previous clubs who went into admin so I don't see why this time will be > any > different. Football had all its debts paid after all. I'm not sure that in previous administrations there have been blatant attempts to use the Leagues own rules to "influence" the way people vote during a CVA. I think it was obvious that the League might be viewing this methodology in a different light to other methodologies. Having said all that, I still don't think the F League will decide to fight this battle. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
