Sorry, you're deluding yourself if you think there's any parallel between the sale of a business under receivership and the sale of a footballer. My point was that the two scenarios are completely different, yet you turn that to somehow support your case. Fact remains that Healey will go for what he's worth, with the value of his current contract and the cost over X years of his next contract being the major factors. And I believe Bates will get the best price he can for him. That's what he does. Like a lot of people here, your hatred of Bates gets in the way of your judgement. You're content to speculate that Morris' property play "seems to project a view forward of having a successful football team at the heart of it.." with no evidence to support it. It's just a case of "anyone but Bates", isn't it. Mark
_______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
