Apology accepted... All things are mere possibilities until they, actually happen one way or the other.
My point was and still is Bates loose tongue and targeted outburst was likely to have a negative effect on value, ... The quote below comes from much later in the argument after you'd interjected the, multiple bidder equals a guarantee of highest possible price factor... plus the addition of ebay etc. It simply re-states that your assertion is not always the case and supports my original point that Bates' comments would not do us any favours in negotiations.. Believe me, I'll be happiest, should your scenario be proven correct, on this occasion. Though I'd hope it brought a little more than you predict...and no less than that sum, if I must be proven correct. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Humphries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:53 AM To: 'Nigel Holcroft'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [LU] Wage deferrals - Healy + who? Erm sorry mate, your original argument was that because Bates wanted rid of Healy we would therefore get the lowest price for Healy. I suppose you forgot to add the word 'possibly' in your original statement? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Holcroft Sent: 08 June 2007 00:38 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LU] Wage deferrals - Healy + who? On the contrary. My point, with any of the scenarios all along has been that the number of bidders is no guarantee of the highest price, nor that, necessarily the sale will even be made to the highest bidder. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
