Erm sorry mate, your original argument was that because Bates wanted rid of Healy we would therefore get the lowest price for Healy. I suppose you forgot to add the word 'possibly' in your original statement?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Holcroft Sent: 08 June 2007 00:38 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LU] Wage deferrals - Healy + who? On the contrary. My point, with any of the scenarios all along has been that the number of bidders is no guarantee of the highest price, nor that, necessarily the sale will even be made to the highest bidder. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
