> 
> I agree with your last para wholeheartedly, it has been my 
> stance as soon as
> we went into admin and it appeared Bates was the best option 
> to get us out
> of it the quickest.

Why does coming out of Admin quickly matter?


> 
> Funny that this stance which was deemed so selfish, shortsighted, ill
> informed, evil etc at the time is now the conciliatory stance!

How so?

> 
> I notice the club have today contacted the FL to ask them 
> when they are
> actually going to reconvene to discuss the GS.  It appears 
> that 'at the
> earliest available opportunity' means something entirely 
> different in the
> ivory towers of the FL than it does for us plebs.  

You said that. I seem to recall asking at the time 'What if the next meeting
isn't whilst August?' You assured me it would be well before then. 

> 
> At the last meeting some 2 weeks back the FL avoided giving 
> the GS back
> because they wanted the paperwork & to seek legal advice.  
> They got the
> paperwork they asked for within hours, so apparently it must be summer
> holiday time for the FL lawyers.  The other explanation could 
> be a continued
> attempt to derail the team building efforts for the upcoming season of
> course.

Oh yes, that's it - and you accuse me of making unfounded statements.
Bates isn't out to get us but the WHOLE of the Football League is!!
You have truly lost it.

Paul


_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org 

Reply via email to