'The system works'. Really begs the question. What was it supposed to be
doing?
If it was supposed to give complete degenerates the right to own a football
club then it works.
But a well run brothel often 'works' better than a good marriage [not that I
would know :)) of course]
Does that mean we give up on family relationships and go in for pimping?
Morality does exist
You can only go so far without it.
As for 'middle aged'. I am 65 so I guess that makes me old age although  I
don't even feel middle aged. I know one thing. Sure there are a hell of a
lot of things that 'you can get away with' & you may measure everything
monetarily. You may know the cost but you certainly end up with no value.
Football and a clubs are esoteric & their value subjective and intrinsic.
Any wanna be robber baron  wanker is not part of that equation and never
will be.
Thus ends the sermon for today.
Please donate to the restoration fund on your way out [AKA Viagra kitty
money]
Michael
Aged 65 and decaying fast!




Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
-------------------------------
myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
http://www.myRay.com
------------------------------
Mental Health:
http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com
--------------------------------
Auditing || Quality Control
http://www.MyDoctorExplains.com/alamo/
--------------------------------
Blog:
http://www.DrMichaelBenjamin.com



2009/10/9 Eric B <[email protected]>

> the FAs heads. As you are aware our monetary system is based on
> capitalism and stock exchanges etc.
> hence if anybody can buy at will so long they can pay for it within
> laws etc. then thats fine.
>
> the system works.
>
> The "crap" that is going on is per design and applying middle age
> style censorship wont fix it.
>
> Eric
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Dr Michael Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Whose heads?
> > Have you seem the crap that is going on.
> > International robber barons playing around with teams.
> > And our  little  hero only rips off St John's Ambulance. No class what so
> > ever .
> > Michael
> > Dr Michael Benjamin,
> > Community Psychiatrist
> > -------------------------------
> > myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
> > http://www.myRay.com
> > ------------------------------
> > Mental Health:
> > http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com
> > --------------------------------
> > Auditing || Quality Control
> > http://www.MyDoctorExplains.com/alamo/
> > --------------------------------
> > Blog:
> > http://www.DrMichaelBenjamin.com
> >
> > Sent from Ramat Gan, Israel
> >
> > 2009/10/8 Eric Barlier <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> this "unfit and improper" is bollocks. how draconian can society get? I
> >> hope Bates gets into trouble, takes into high court and knocks it down.
> >> enough of these self righteous idiots that come up with these ideas, let
> the
> >> heads roll!
> >>
> >> Vive la revolution,
> >> Monseigneur Barlier
> >>
> >> On 09/10/2009, at 5:16 AM, Jeremy Adams wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> So the FA have asked Leeds to clarify the owners of the club. What
> happens
> >> if those persons are deemed to be unfit and improper? What happens if
> they
> >> refuse to be identified? Do they have to denounce ownership immediately?
> >> Does the club get fined and or points deducted? What happens if there's
> no
> >> one to step in and be fit and proper? Does the club just go under?
> >> Points deduction would be harsh, unlike administration there has been no
> >> benefit playing wise that has come about from having dodgy owners. Going
> in
> >> to admin wipes out your debt and means you can pay decent wages again so
> >> there is a distinct advantage to that. Of course this is Leeds we're
> talking
> >> about so we're bound to get -30 points or something.
> >> Discuss
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list
> administrators
> >> accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
> >> Leedslist mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >> http://www.worldnet.org.uk WorldNET2009
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list
> administrators
> >> accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
> >> Leedslist mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >> http://www.worldnet.org.uk WorldNET2009
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
http://www.worldnet.org.uk WorldNET2009

Reply via email to