What's it got to do with you Frenchie? ;-)
> "Debate" is not actually the word I would have used for an event which was > more a series of speechlets from each leader, most of which were in > complete > isolation to everything else (whatever point they were trying to ram > home). > I have to say though, I did give credit to Brown for almost always linking > his points, however tenouosly, to the question asked (though he often > ignored points raised by the other leaders...). This brings me back to my > original mail - Cameron didn't. It doesn't matter why not to me, I'm just > amazed that he obviously got away with it so well. > > Damian > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Mark Humphries < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Browns "answers" seemed to either consist of how much money they had or >> would spend, or to totally ignore the question and try and swing it >> round >> to >> the libdems and conservatives abolishing child tax credits. >> >> > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > and the hardest time in a sailor's day is to watch the sun as it sails > away > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist and the hardest time in a sailor's day is to watch the sun as it sails away
