It could very well explain the difference. 
"Genealogy" used to be the term which was always used
but more and more often I seeing "family history".

To add on a bit - I have two databases, my family and
my husband's.  Since I don't have any children, his
are from a previous marriage, it works quite well for
me.

Mary Beth Figgins

--- Claire Spinelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I think it's interesting that you use the term
> "family history."  I think
> there's a difference between "genealogy" and "family
> history" which might
> partially explain the vast difference in database
> sizes.  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Mary
> Figgins
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:47 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Criteria you use to add an
> individual to Legacy?
> 
> In addition to the obvious I will sometimes add side
> lines that I happen to come across in my records
> search that might aid my research later.  Such as
> names in a probate, that might confirm that this is
> a
> relation.
> 
> I will also more likely to follow families that came
> to Kansas even if they are not near my direct line. 
> Simply because I have access to Kansas records.
> 
> I have also been known to follow people that catch
> my
> interest.  Maybe they have an interesting occupation
> or maybe it's a single woman who was leaving a lot
> of
> money to people when she died.  Where did her money
> come from?  Or it maybe someone of prominence like
> Red
> Kate Richards O'Hare, a prominent Kansas socialist,
> who is on a side line of mine.
> 
> There is no firm rule of who to add.  It's whatever
> works for you and that's the fun of doing family
> history.
> 
> Mary Beth Figgins
> 
> 
> --- George Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Claire,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > There is nothing wrong with your thinking,
> everyone
> > to their
> > own choice as to how many limbs you want to go out
> > on your
> > tree.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > I am one of those who have extended my 3d and 4th
> > cousins
> > lines past any direct connection.  I do this
> because
> > I enjoy
> > looking up the family histories and some of these
> > distant
> > links have lead back to direct line family members
> > that I
> > was
> > having trouble finding info. 
> > 
> > A small database is ok based on your own
> > preferences.
> > 
> > Keep on digging,
> > 
> > George in Arizona
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >   _____  
> > 
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On
> > Behalf Of Claire Spinelli
> > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 9:49 AM
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> > Subject: [LegacyUG] Criteria you use to add an
> > individual to
> > Legacy?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > I often read of people who have thousands and
> > thousands of
> > people in their database.  Today I read of one
> over
> > 100,000.
> > I have trouble envisioning where all these people
> > come from
> > :-)  I feel like a slouch - my best branch
> (paternal
> > grandfather) only has about 400 people in it and I
> > thought I
> > was doing pretty well.  I add direct line
> ancestors,
> > of
> > course, their siblings, all spouses and children
> > involved.
> > I also include the parents of any spouses, though,
> > and
> > generally just make a note of their siblings.  For
> > instance,
> > the wife of my great-uncle would be included, as
> > would her
> > parents, but that would be the end of her line. 
> (I
> > hope I'm
> > explaining this so it can be understood.)  I read
> > questions
> > about downloading gedcoms found online.  Perhaps
> I'm
> > not as
> > fortunate as others, but the gedcoms I've found
> have
> > only
> > included 3 or 4 people that would be relevant to
> me.
> >  In
> > that case, I import the gedcom into its own file,
> > and only
> > enter into my main database the 3 or 4 people.  To
> > do
> > otherwise would, to me, create useless clutter.
> > 
> > Is there something wrong with my thinking?
> > 
> > Claire
> > 
> > Legacy User Group guidelines:
> >    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > Archived messages:
> >  
> >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > .com/
> > Online technical support:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > To unsubscribe:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Legacy User Group guidelines: 
> >    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > Archived messages: 
> >   
> >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> > Online technical support:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > To unsubscribe:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> ________
> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
> 
=== message truncated ===



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to