My point was that there is aparently no known (to me) population size, that guarantees inclusion in the various map programs. The USA has the same lack of 'criterion'. I have since its first download, requested adding locations missing from the GEO. I gave up. Rich in LA CA
----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 6, 2008 6:26:16 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Geo Location RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote: > What is the population of the place; Kingston upon Thames. I have found > some locations in USA with under 500 people are randomly not found. I > have come to expect them to not be there and have not kept a list of > which weren't found, because it seemed futile. If the database is > improved later, they may show up. I 'created' my own L/L numbers using > maps and my rulers, as guesstimate. A great many more than 500! There were, between 1970 and 1974, at least 1500 students! Big commuter town. County town - the equivalent of a state capital I suppose. -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
