Ron, That's because you selected to not reuse abandoned RINs. As far as Legacy is concerned any empty RINs in the "middle" are abandoned.
Selecting to reuse abandoned RINs would start filling that blank space with the lowest 'empty' RIN. Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald ferguson Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [LegacyUG] New RINs I have just finished importing a new family and as is my practice gave them a high RIN. I then merged the father with an individual in my tree and renumbered the new family's RINs to carry on from end of the existing family. A procedure which I have carried out many times in the past. I have Legacy set "not to reuse abandoned RINs" as this would cause me awful problems with my Pedigree web pages. However, I now find that when I enter a new individual he/she is being allocated a RIN greater than the last of the imported file and not the next in the current list. Has anyone else noticed this change and can someone tell me where the pointer for the next RIN is stored so that I can change it? Thanks in advance Ron Ferguson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
