Carolyn, I had no intention of geting involved in this thread, but I am quite at a loss as to how you show where people have lived during their lifetime if they are not in, say the Location field of a Residence Event.
Specifically in Web Pages and Reports. Ron Ferguson _____________________________________________________________________ Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced http://www.fergys.co.uk/ View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _____________________________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- > From: wood...@msn.com > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Location Names and Addresses > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:47:22 -0700 > > I don't enter the city, county, etc. in the Event Addresses. That way you > don't get the redundant addresses. You can still enter the coordinates, for > mapping purposes. I usually look up the street address of the cemetery so I > have the exact coordinates rather than just the city's. > > I have no problem printing the Event Notes - just have the appropriate box > checked in Report Options. > > > Carolyn > > > -----Original Message----- > From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf > Of Paula Ryburn > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:20 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Location Names and Addresses > > > Cathy, > > Although I am still on the fence with this, I currently have almost all of > my cemeteries, hospitals and churches in the Event Address list. If, > however, you use "book" reports, you'll find that when the cemetery (eg) is > printed in parens, it will include the entire address... which is redundant. > > Further, although I haven't tested it recently, it seems I remember the > Event Address Notes don't print anywhere. (For that matter, I don't know if > the Location Notes do either.) > > --Paula in Texas > > > --- On Wed, 6/24/09, Cathy wrote: > >> >> I've a question to all who place the cemetery name into the >> Location field: why don't you use the Burial Address >> section? >> >> I use the Burial Address section and when I want to see who >> I have buried in a specific cemetery, I can go into Burial >> Address -> Address List. Then I select a specific >> cemetery, click on the Show List button and then click on >> the Print button. Then when I go to the cemetery to >> take photographs, I have the list of everyone I need to >> find. If I want several cemeteries, I can tag them and >> print those tagged lists. >> >> Also, once I've placed a cemetery into the Burial List, I >> can call it up from the Address List and I don't have to >> recreate the name and address over and over again. I >> can also add the cemetery's phone number, GPS coordinates, >> web address and additional information in the cemetery's >> notes fields (i.e., directions on getting there or notes on >> how old the cemetery is.) >> >> I realize that different people have different styles, but >> I was curious as to why you would prefer placing cemetery >> names into a location field and getting reports that way as >> opposed to using the cemetery burial address field which >> allows for so much more. >> >> Just curious. >> >> Cathy > _________________________________________________________________ With Windows Live, you can organise, edit, and share your photos. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
