You know I was quite content before I joined this group, now look at all the 
extra things I have to think about LOL

I've been doing a lot of searching through early Australian newspapers  and 
find generally the 'colonies' of Australia (up to 1900) all referred to 
themselves simply as Queensland, New South Wales, there doesn't seem to be much 
reference to the word colony.
Exception was Tasmania which in very early times was part of the New South 
Wales colony and known as Van Diemans Land - it became Tasmania sometime around 
1850.

So speaking for my mainly Australian research, I'm personally happy to forego 
history to a point, drop the word 'colony'  and call them by the name they took 
on after Federation which seems to be the name they themselves were happy to 
use before Federation.

Another problem is when areas change names, I have several localities which 
were probably named for the local landowners and now no longer exist under that 
name. I add this sort of information to my general notes field and also into 
the notes in the edit location window.

But then I suppose, we have to consider how far we are going with our research, 
if I  were planning to publish a book on my findings I would have to rethink 
the historical accuracy, even though the only 'inaccuracy' is the use of the 
word 'colony'

Cheers
Erica

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Rolfe [mailto:geneal...@gillandtony.com]
Sent: Saturday, 29 October 2011 4:50 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Showing historical locations.

I'm not all that sure about American history, but I believe that before
1776 the United States didn't exist.  What are now the states were British 
Colonies.  Certainly, Australia didn't exist before Federation in 1901.

My question is...

If you have events which happened before 1776 in the Americas or before
1901 in the Australian colonies, do you still say that it happened in Norfolk, 
Virginia, America or in Norfolk, Virginia Colony?  (I realise that a county 
should appear in there somewhere, but that's not the main point).

What about Clermont, Queensland, Australia vs Clermont, Queensland Colony?

Is it worth having two location names for the same place to get historical 
accuracy or is it better to simplify and forego history?





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to