Because we ask for a lot of stuff, and we haven't made enough noise about this one, not to mention the things they need to add to attract new customers. Not intending to sound as cynical as I do! Probably because I used to be in software development. I'm sure there is some sort of change to the database, and that logic is everywhere--these are the original fields we're talking about, not recently added ones. And there is a workaround--using the notes (as already suggested here), and I think some folks put something into the detail citation text or comment to indicate what data specifically is supported by that source. --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams
________________________________ From: Michele Lewis <ancestor...@gmail.com> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Mon, February 20, 2012 9:15:23 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] suggestion I submitted So why do you think they don’t change it if other people have suggested it? michele Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
