I was going to say “good point” to Cheryl’s comment but your response is even “gooder”. Legacy makes these things all so flexible for the user. Just gotta love a program that does that!
From: CE WOOD [mailto:wood...@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:01 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] When to use AKAs But whether AKAs print in reports is up to you because it is an option. CE > From: singh...@erols.com > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] When to use AKAs > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:22:23 -0500 > > Brian/Support wrote: > > > recorded in the source transcription but the AKA is a more visible place > > to see that somewhere his name was recorded with that transcription error. > > Do I actually /want/ 36 variant surname spellings to be > "more visible" in reports that cover 328 people would be a > question to consider, though. > > > Cheryl Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
