Hi Barbara, What you seem to be missing is that we're all invididuals with our own likes and dislikes, needs and preferences, and just because you like the way Source Writer presents its sources doesn't mean it works for everyone, whether it is for aesthetic or technical reasons.
Legacy is a very flexible program, and we can all make our own choices about how to use its features to our own benefit and liking. It's not right or wrong. It's just different. Hope this helps. :-) Wendy Barbara Shroyer wrote on 19/01/2015 10:37: > Confused. SourceWriter sources are much better than the basic sources. My > sources imported from TMG into Legacy as Basic and I'm in the slow process of > changing them to SourceWriter. The SourceWriter sources are better written. > They also have the Full Citation, Subsequent Citation, and Bibliography while > Basic does not. What am I missing in this thread? > Barbara Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
