Cathy, Thanks. No, I hadn't seen that report. Barbara On January 18, 2015 7:57:08 PM MST, Cathy Pinner <genea...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Barbara, >Have you found the Source Citations Report? Reports - Other Reports - >Source Citations OR Master Source List - Options - Print. > >Cathy > >Pat Hickin wrote: >> >> Barbara, >> >> The only lists of citations that I know of are those at the end of >> reports. >> >> Pat >> >> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Barbara Shroyer ><karenhapp...@cox.net >> <mailto:karenhapp...@cox.net>> wrote: >> >> Pat,____ >> >> Your Basic source Footnote/Endnote Citation and Subsequent >> Citation are identical. Your Bibliography is also the same except >> for omitting the Source Detail. With SourceWriter the all three >> are different. The Subsequent Citation will be shorter, often >> much shorter, than the Footnote/Endnote Citation. ____ >> >> A deed using sourcewriter:____ >> >> *_Footnote/Endnote Citation:_*____ >> >> Stark County, Ohio, Deed Books, C: 53-54, Henry Bortner to Leonard >> Shroyer, 31 May 1815; FHL microfilm 956004. ____ >> >> __ __ >> >> *_Subsequent Citation:_*____ >> >> Stark County, Ohio, Deed Books, C: 53-54. ____ >> >> __ __ >> >> *_Bibliography:_*____ >> >> Ohio. Stark County. Deed Books. FHL microfilm 956004. Family >> History Library, Salt Lake City, Utah.____ >> >> __ __ >> >> Is there a “List of Citationsâ€Â. All I can find is a List of >> Sources and I can then click Show List (of people with source). >> That eventually takes me to citations.____ >> >> __ __ >> >> Barbara*______* >> >> __ __ >> >> *From:*Pat Hickin [mailto:pph...@gmail.com <mailto:pph...@gmail.com>] >> *Sent:* Sunday, January 18, 2015 6:10 PM >> *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com >> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Some questions about getting rid of >> Sourcewriter sources____ >> >> __ __ >> >> Barbara,____ >> >> __ __ >> >> You write "They [Source Writer] also have the Full Citation, >> Subsequent Citation, and Bibliography while Basic does not."____ >> >> __ __ >> >> Where is it that Basic does not have these??____ >> >> __ __ >> >> If I go to my list of citations [mostly Basic} and highlight the >> very first one [Basic], this is what shows at the bottom of the >> window:____ >> >> __ __ >> >> *Footnote/Endnote Citation:*____ >> >> 1785 Census VA BOT - TAXES - VA _BOT - 1785 Anc, Botetourt >> County, VA, Virginia, Compiled Census and Census Substitutes >> Index, 1607-1890 (Plus the missing counties for the 1810 >> Census)Reconstructed 1790 and 1800 Federal Censuses using Tax List >> Microfilm Images with Every Name Indexes (Source >> Information:Ancestry.com. Virginia, Compiled Census and Census >> Substitutes Index, 1607-1890 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: >> Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.Original data: Jackson, Ron V., >> Accelerated Indexing Systems, comp.. Virginia Census, 1607-1890. >> Compiled and digitized by Mr. Jackson and AIS from microfilmed >> schedules of the U.S. Federal Decennial Census, territorial/state >> censuses, and/or census substitutes.). Rec. Date: 27 May 2014. >> "Everyone knows that the Federal Census Schedules are an excellent >> source of genealogical information. Unfortunately the Virginia >> Censuses for 1790 and 1800 are lost and can never be replaced. But >> the early tax records of the Virginian counties still survive and >> list all individuals charged with a tax. They may also contain >> names of young men who were tithable, or taxable, much like a male >> dependent of a household. Names of recently deceased individuals >> whose property was still in estate are also listed. There are many >> clues in tax lists that suggest family relationships that can not >> be found in the early censuses. Therefore these tax lists can be >> used as an alternative census for the missing 1790 and 1800 >> Federal Censuses of Virginia."Here you will find FREE online >> images and indexes of the Virginia Tax Lists (Land and/or Personal >> Property Tax Lists) for each of the individual counties and cities >> that would have been included in the Federal Censuses. These tax >> list images and indexes are used to reconstruct the 1790 and 1800 >> censuses. The years of "1790" and "1800" are considered an >> approximate year. In some cases the actual year 1790 or 1800 tax >> list was very hard to read on the microfilm so we went up or down >> a couple of years to find better quality images."As a BONUS we >> have added a new section for the missing Virginia counties of the >> 1810 Federal Census. This Federal Census is missing 18 Virginia >> counties. The tax lists are an excellent substitute for these >> missing counties."Each list will be indexed as time permits. We >> are constantly gathering tax lists and will post updates as >> needed. If you do not find your particular tax list here today it >> may be here tomorrow." ____ >> >> __ __ >> >> *Subsequent Citation:*____ >> >> 1785 Census VA BOT - TAXES - VA _BOT - 1785 Anc, Botetourt >> County, VA, Virginia, Compiled Census and Census Substitutes >> Index, 1607-1890 (Plus the missing counties for the 1810 >> Census)Reconstructed 1790 and 1800 Federal Censuses using Tax List >> Microfilm Images with Every Name Indexes (Source >> Information:Ancestry.com. Virginia, Compiled Census and Census >> Substitutes Index, 1607-1890 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: >> Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.Original data: Jackson, Ron V., >> Accelerated Indexing Systems, comp.. Virginia Census, 1607-1890. >> Compiled and digitized by Mr. Jackson and AIS from microfilmed >> schedules of the U.S. Federal Decennial Census, territorial/state >> censuses, and/or census substitutes.). Rec. Date: 27 May 2014. >> "Everyone knows that the Federal Census Schedules are an excellent >> source of genealogical information. Unfortunately the Virginia >> Censuses for 1790 and 1800 are lost and can never be replaced. But >> the early tax records of the Virginian counties still survive and >> list all individuals charged with a tax. They may also contain >> names of young men who were tithable, or taxable, much like a male >> dependent of a household. Names of recently deceased individuals >> whose property was still in estate are also listed. There are many >> clues in tax lists that suggest family relationships that can not >> be found in the early censuses. Therefore these tax lists can be >> used as an alternative census for the missing 1790 and 1800 >> Federal Censuses of Virginia."Here you will find FREE online >> images and indexes of the Virginia Tax Lists (Land and/or Personal >> Property Tax Lists) for each of the individual counties and cities >> that would have been included in the Federal Censuses. These tax >> list images and indexes are used to reconstruct the 1790 and 1800 >> censuses. The years of "1790" and "1800" are considered an >> approximate year. In some cases the actual year 1790 or 1800 tax >> list was very hard to read on the microfilm so we went up or down >> a couple of years to find better quality images."As a BONUS we >> have added a new section for the missing Virginia counties of the >> 1810 Federal Census. This Federal Census is missing 18 Virginia >> counties. The tax lists are an excellent substitute for these >> missing counties."Each list will be indexed as time permits. We >> are constantly gathering tax lists and will post updates as >> needed. If you do not find your particular tax list here today it >> may be here tomorrow." ____ >> >> __ __ >> >> *Bibliography:*____ >> >> 1785 Census VA BOT - TAXES - VA _BOT - 1785 Anc, Botetourt >> County, VA, Virginia, Compiled Census and Census Substitutes >> Index, 1607-1890 (Plus the missing counties for the 1810 >> Census)Reconstructed 1790 and 1800 Federal Censuses using Tax List >> Microfilm Images with Every Name Indexes (Source >> Information:Ancestry.com. Virginia, Compiled Census and Census >> Substitutes Index, 1607-1890 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: >> Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.Original data: Jackson, Ron V., >> Accelerated Indexing Systems, comp.. Virginia Census, 1607-1890. >> Compiled and digitized by Mr. Jackson and AIS from microfilmed >> schedules of the U.S. Federal Decennial Census, territorial/state >> censuses, and/or census substitutes.) Rec. Date: 27 May 2014." ____ >> >> __ __ >> >> ____ >> >> >> >> Legacy User Group guidelines: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ >> Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com >> Follow Legacy on Facebook >> (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog >> (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp >> >> >> >> >> Legacy User Group guidelines: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ >> Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) >> and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > >Legacy User Group guidelines: > >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > >Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > >Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > >Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com > >Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) >and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > >To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
