Hi Barbara, Have you found the Source Citations Report? Reports - Other Reports - Source Citations OR Master Source List - Options - Print.
Cathy Pat Hickin wrote: > > Barbara, > > The only lists of citations that I know of are those at the end of > reports. > > Pat > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Barbara Shroyer <karenhapp...@cox.net > <mailto:karenhapp...@cox.net>> wrote: > > Pat,____ > > Your Basic source Footnote/Endnote Citation and Subsequent > Citation are identical. Your Bibliography is also the same except > for omitting the Source Detail. With SourceWriter the all three > are different. The Subsequent Citation will be shorter, often > much shorter, than the Footnote/Endnote Citation. ____ > > A deed using sourcewriter:____ > > *_Footnote/Endnote Citation:_*____ > > Stark County, Ohio, Deed Books, C: 53-54, Henry Bortner to Leonard > Shroyer, 31 May 1815; FHL microfilm 956004. ____ > > __ __ > > *_Subsequent Citation:_*____ > > Stark County, Ohio, Deed Books, C: 53-54. ____ > > __ __ > > *_Bibliography:_*____ > > Ohio. Stark County. Deed Books. FHL microfilm 956004. Family > History Library, Salt Lake City, Utah.____ > > __ __ > > Is there a “List of Citationsâ€. All I can find is a List of > Sources and I can then click Show List (of people with source). > That eventually takes me to citations.____ > > __ __ > > Barbara*______* > > __ __ > > *From:*Pat Hickin [mailto:pph...@gmail.com <mailto:pph...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Sunday, January 18, 2015 6:10 PM > *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com > *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Some questions about getting rid of > Sourcewriter sources____ > > __ __ > > Barbara,____ > > __ __ > > You write "They [Source Writer] also have the Full Citation, > Subsequent Citation, and Bibliography while Basic does not."____ > > __ __ > > Where is it that Basic does not have these??____ > > __ __ > > If I go to my list of citations [mostly Basic} and highlight the > very first one [Basic], this is what shows at the bottom of the > window:____ > > __ __ > > *Footnote/Endnote Citation:*____ > > 1785 Census VA BOT - TAXES - VA _BOT - 1785 Anc, Botetourt > County, VA, Virginia, Compiled Census and Census Substitutes > Index, 1607-1890 (Plus the missing counties for the 1810 > Census)Reconstructed 1790 and 1800 Federal Censuses using Tax List > Microfilm Images with Every Name Indexes (Source > Information:Ancestry.com. Virginia, Compiled Census and Census > Substitutes Index, 1607-1890 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: > Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.Original data: Jackson, Ron V., > Accelerated Indexing Systems, comp.. Virginia Census, 1607-1890. > Compiled and digitized by Mr. Jackson and AIS from microfilmed > schedules of the U.S. Federal Decennial Census, territorial/state > censuses, and/or census substitutes.). Rec. Date: 27 May 2014. > "Everyone knows that the Federal Census Schedules are an excellent > source of genealogical information. Unfortunately the Virginia > Censuses for 1790 and 1800 are lost and can never be replaced. But > the early tax records of the Virginian counties still survive and > list all individuals charged with a tax. They may also contain > names of young men who were tithable, or taxable, much like a male > dependent of a household. Names of recently deceased individuals > whose property was still in estate are also listed. There are many > clues in tax lists that suggest family relationships that can not > be found in the early censuses. Therefore these tax lists can be > used as an alternative census for the missing 1790 and 1800 > Federal Censuses of Virginia."Here you will find FREE online > images and indexes of the Virginia Tax Lists (Land and/or Personal > Property Tax Lists) for each of the individual counties and cities > that would have been included in the Federal Censuses. These tax > list images and indexes are used to reconstruct the 1790 and 1800 > censuses. The years of "1790" and "1800" are considered an > approximate year. In some cases the actual year 1790 or 1800 tax > list was very hard to read on the microfilm so we went up or down > a couple of years to find better quality images."As a BONUS we > have added a new section for the missing Virginia counties of the > 1810 Federal Census. This Federal Census is missing 18 Virginia > counties. The tax lists are an excellent substitute for these > missing counties."Each list will be indexed as time permits. We > are constantly gathering tax lists and will post updates as > needed. If you do not find your particular tax list here today it > may be here tomorrow." ____ > > __ __ > > *Subsequent Citation:*____ > > 1785 Census VA BOT - TAXES - VA _BOT - 1785 Anc, Botetourt > County, VA, Virginia, Compiled Census and Census Substitutes > Index, 1607-1890 (Plus the missing counties for the 1810 > Census)Reconstructed 1790 and 1800 Federal Censuses using Tax List > Microfilm Images with Every Name Indexes (Source > Information:Ancestry.com. Virginia, Compiled Census and Census > Substitutes Index, 1607-1890 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: > Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.Original data: Jackson, Ron V., > Accelerated Indexing Systems, comp.. Virginia Census, 1607-1890. > Compiled and digitized by Mr. Jackson and AIS from microfilmed > schedules of the U.S. Federal Decennial Census, territorial/state > censuses, and/or census substitutes.). Rec. Date: 27 May 2014. > "Everyone knows that the Federal Census Schedules are an excellent > source of genealogical information. Unfortunately the Virginia > Censuses for 1790 and 1800 are lost and can never be replaced. But > the early tax records of the Virginian counties still survive and > list all individuals charged with a tax. They may also contain > names of young men who were tithable, or taxable, much like a male > dependent of a household. Names of recently deceased individuals > whose property was still in estate are also listed. There are many > clues in tax lists that suggest family relationships that can not > be found in the early censuses. Therefore these tax lists can be > used as an alternative census for the missing 1790 and 1800 > Federal Censuses of Virginia."Here you will find FREE online > images and indexes of the Virginia Tax Lists (Land and/or Personal > Property Tax Lists) for each of the individual counties and cities > that would have been included in the Federal Censuses. These tax > list images and indexes are used to reconstruct the 1790 and 1800 > censuses. The years of "1790" and "1800" are considered an > approximate year. In some cases the actual year 1790 or 1800 tax > list was very hard to read on the microfilm so we went up or down > a couple of years to find better quality images."As a BONUS we > have added a new section for the missing Virginia counties of the > 1810 Federal Census. This Federal Census is missing 18 Virginia > counties. The tax lists are an excellent substitute for these > missing counties."Each list will be indexed as time permits. We > are constantly gathering tax lists and will post updates as > needed. If you do not find your particular tax list here today it > may be here tomorrow." ____ > > __ __ > > *Bibliography:*____ > > 1785 Census VA BOT - TAXES - VA _BOT - 1785 Anc, Botetourt > County, VA, Virginia, Compiled Census and Census Substitutes > Index, 1607-1890 (Plus the missing counties for the 1810 > Census)Reconstructed 1790 and 1800 Federal Censuses using Tax List > Microfilm Images with Every Name Indexes (Source > Information:Ancestry.com. Virginia, Compiled Census and Census > Substitutes Index, 1607-1890 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: > Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.Original data: Jackson, Ron V., > Accelerated Indexing Systems, comp.. Virginia Census, 1607-1890. > Compiled and digitized by Mr. Jackson and AIS from microfilmed > schedules of the U.S. Federal Decennial Census, territorial/state > censuses, and/or census substitutes.) Rec. Date: 27 May 2014." ____ > > __ __ > > ____ > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com > Follow Legacy on Facebook > (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog > (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) > and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
