The original message to the list is in the attachment.
This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy
imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages
without conversion to attachments should use a different email address
for their subscription.
Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require
this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email
providers will also work but you will have to give them a try.
--- Begin Message ---
I had a couple of people in my tree that I have to question if they are really
the right people too. I unlinked those people from the parents, thereby taking
them off my tree, but leaving them in my database. If I find that these people
actually are who I think they are, I can again link them to have them in my
tree again. Those "same names, same time period" can be tough, and I think most
of us probably have to contend with that problem.
I agree with Linda G. I would rather have 3 or 4 generations that are correct,
than 15 or 20 that are questionable. The person with the most names in their
tree doesn't necessarily win.
Ed
On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:12 AM, Laura G <beage...@charter.net> wrote:
Have you considered making a DB showing the details of each person? I have
had similar problems and a DB helps sorth these things out> L:aura
-----Original Message-----
From: June
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:49 PM
To: 'Legacy User Group'
Subject: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my tree
On my tree I have a direct line that I will call SMITH. Unfortunately within
this Smith group there are several called John (all born around the same
time) several called Michael (all born around the same time) etc many of
these being cousins or second cousins.
I have a feeling that I have put the wrong children with parents, and
therefore their children are connected incorrectly.
I've tried to look at each family grouping to see if I can sort it out but
it's difficult. I've got a John Smith born 1700 with son John Smith and
another one born 1710 with a son John Smith and still another one born say
1705.
I am thinking that my best bet would be to unlink the first Smith to link
into my tree, thereby hopefully unlinking them all. Then start attaching
them one by one back into the tree - but only when I have double checked
that I have the right person (although I thought that I had).
So I need to unlink my first Smith and all their connections, either by
blood or marriage from my main Coates file. Is this possible and if so how.
Or is there an easier solution?
Thank you
June
--
_______________________________________________
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
_______________________________________________
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
--- End Message ---
--
_______________________________________________
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
