On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:00:35 -0700, "Geoff Rasmussen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>>From http://legacynews.typepad.com/legacy_news/2006/01/legacy_update_n.html:
>
>Publishing Center Fixes:
>
>- Compiler and Credit lines were printing above the bottom line for the
>"Additional" pages such as Preface, Forward, etc.  Fixed. 
>- Fixed some RTF format issues.

When is the problem I reported just before the cruise going to be fixed?
Below is a copy of the correspondence Ken and I had. Ken issued a last
minute update just before he left on the cruise, but the update did not
fix the problem.

Dennis

-- 
>To: "Dennis Kowallek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Serious problem in V6?
>From: "Ken McGinnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:21:22 -0700
>
>Thanks for helping figure this one out.   I have it fixed and we'll do a build 
>right away.
>
>Thanks
>
>Ken McGinnis
>Millennia Corporation
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>We are changing the world of genealogy!
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Dennis Kowallek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Ken McGinnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:14 AM
>Subject: Re: Serious problem in V6?
>
>
>I have duplicated the Bug (with a capital 'B'). I'd really like to hear the
>explanation for this one!
>
>If I go into the Publishing Center and preview my book, every individual I
>edit from that point on comes up with the short location names in birth,
>baptism, death, and burial place instead of long location names. So if I hit
>Save on that window, 4 new locations get added to tblLR.
>
>I'm glad I'm not going nuts.
>
>When will we get a fix for this?
>
>-- 
>
>Dennis
>
>***
>
>On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:05:22 -0700, "Ken McGinnis"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Dennis,
>>
>>I cannot reproduce this problem.   Can you open up the Sample file and play
>>around with it and see if you can figure out how to make the Short locations
>>show on the Edit screen.   I think that once they show on the edit screen that
>>they had to be messed up somewhere else first.   Can you remember what you 
>>were
>>doing that might have caused this?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Ken McGinnis
>>Millennia Corporation
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>>We are changing the world of genealogy!
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Dave Berdan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "zKen McGinnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 10:53 AM
>>Subject: Fw: Serious problem in V6?
>>
>>
>>> This is in your arena...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --
>>> Dave Berdan
>>> Millennia
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dennis Kowallek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 6:44 AM
>>> Subject: Serious problem in V6?
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave:
>>>
>>> I am writing you directly about this potential problem in V6 because I think
>>> it needs prompt attention.
>>>
>>> This is difficult to describe, so please bear with me.
>>>
>>> I have my options set up to display short location names on screen views.
>>> Today I opened a database to the family view in V6. Those short location
>>> names
>>> were being displayed as expected. Then, when I opened up an individual's
>>> information screen, I just happened to notice that the short location names
>>> were being displayed there also. At first I thought this was odd, but
>>> possibly
>>> this was a new feature in V6. But this didn't make any sense.
>>>
>>> So I opened up tblLR in Access and found what appear to be 5 new rows at the
>>> very bottom of the table that I am positive I did not knowingly add.
>>>
>>> Here is one of the correct tblLR rows...
>>>
>>>>614 Topolyán, Zemplén, Hungary 1 Hungary, Zemplén, Topolyán 0 Topolyán 0 0
>>> 0 0
>>>
>>> Here is one of the new rows that somehow has gotten inserted (and is now
>>> being
>>> pointed to by this individual)...
>>>
>>>>897 Topolyán 0 , , Topolyán 0 Topolyán 0 0 0 0
>>>
>>> As you can see, this new row consists of what was the short name from the
>>> original row in both the short and long name of the new row.
>>>
>>> Looking at backups from the past few days, it appears that the anomaly
>>> happened yesterday (10/12). I have a backup from 10/11 which does not
>>> exhibit
>>> the problem. The backup from 10/12 does. From what I can tell, only the
>>> locations associated with two individuals (that I happened to update
>>> yesterday) are a problem. Not every individual I updated since yesterday is
>>> affected.
>>>
>>> But I did find one problem in another database I updated yesterday also.
>>>
>>> The backups are at...
>>>
>>> http://www.iglou.com/members/kowallek/zajacz-20051011.zip
>>> http://www.iglou.com/members/kowallek/zajacz-20051012.zip
>>>
>>> ...if you want to have a look. Compare RINs 217 and 218.
>>>
>>> I am running 6.0.0.66. I installed V6 on 10/11.
>>>
>>> Please get back to me as soon as possible. I am not going to be updating my
>>> database until I hear back from you.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Dennis M. Kowallek
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> ******************
-- 

Dennis M. Kowallek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

******************
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to