On 20 Oct 2009, at 11:03, Sam Larsen wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking into the proper attribution of OSM in a tiled web > mapping scenario. I know the guidelines on attribution can be found > on the wiki - and i have read them. > There is also the list of non-conforming sites: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution > Does anyone think, we should have a list of 'conforming' sites - as > the CloudMade maps and even the main www.openstreetmap.org are > listed as not having proper attribution.
I think we should be kicking arse to get better conformance on this rather than accepting that major websites and players within the community are not conforming. > I think it would be useful to have at least one example of > conforming attribution (even though i know the attribution will > change in the near future anyway) for people to use as a case > study / reference. Of course if people were to be referencing this > website, it would have to be absolutely correct and stay unchanged > while it is used as a reference. > > Maybe a site could be mocked-up within the wiki somewhere? > > I haven't contributed to the wiki before - maybe this could be my > calling - if anyone thinks it is needed. Sounds like a great idea - some simple html that one can cut and paste into one's application would be a great idea and may indeed be your 'calling' :) Regards, Peter > > > > Sam Larsen > Web GIS Specialist > York St, Cambridge, UK, CB1 2PY > M: +44 (0)794 433 7455 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk