On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:33:44PM +0000, Rob Myers wrote: > back, and that having changed licences once it's important that OSM be > able to change/upgrade/whatever the licence in the future
I believe the contributor terms are too broad. I answered the poll in favour of moving to the ODbL, but failed to take into account the contributor terms. The upgrade clause in the ODbL should be sufficient for any future licensing, and if the change is away from that, I expect as a contributor to be consulted about it. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
