On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Simon Ward <si...@bleah.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:21:41AM +0000, Matt Amos wrote: >>> It may suit you, as a consumer of OSM data, to not give a damn about >>> contributing back to the project, but that's not what OSM is about. >> >> i'm both a producer and a consumer of OSM data. and i do care about >> contributing back, which is why i'm volunteering my time to help >> replace the broken license we currently have with one which works, >> rather than behaving in a derogatory and uncivil manner on the mailing >> lists. > > I didn’t detect any uncivility on the part of 80n, and comments like > yours would just worsen any impression of the situation, so please > refrain.
i thought the implication that i don't contribute to OSM, and don't "give a damn about contributing back to the project" was extremely derogatory. maybe i need to go re-order some thicker skin, because mine is clearly wearing thin. > My view on the ODbL is it’s a much better fit. It’s the contributor > terms that are currently broken and need fixing, otherwise we move from > one broken situation to another just as broken situation. great! LWG is working on it, and your concerns have been noted. cheers, matt _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
