On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Chris Fleming <m...@chrisfleming.org> wrote:
> > Although the intent of ODBl is to provide the protections we thought we > were getting with CC-BY-SA; if we were to go to something *completely* > different then I can image these discussions getting *really* nasty. > > Chris Do try to pay attention and keep up with the thread ;) Diane Peters of Creative Commons posted the following statement in this thread a few hours ago: "There are a number of fundamental differences between CC's licenses and ODbL that at least from CC's point of view make the two quite different." ODbL is something "completely" different. In addition the content license and the contributor terms have no parallel with CC-BY-SA. Structurally there are big differences. 80n
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
