On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Kai Krueger wrote: snip
> Enough of preamble, so here again I would like to ask the question again: > > What is the criterion of when "critical mass" is reached and thus data is > lost (even if it isn't lost as data, it is lost to the project and the > (editing) community)? Who gets to decide this criterion? What are the > objectives of those deciding this criterion? What influence does the wider > community have on setting these criteria? Will at least the full OSMF > membership have a vote on the question of if it is enough. If yes, what > would be the formalities of this vote? simple majority? Absolute majority > of members? > snip > So far the the impressions I got from the members of the licensing group > vary from anywhere between e.g. 10% data loss is acceptable to as high as > 90% data loss is acceptable (as long as a majority of signed up accounts > agree), which means as far as I can interpret, there is no where close to > an agreed process even within the licensing group. When do we get an answer to this question set? Almost 3 weeks have gone, and again no straight answers. It has become quite obvious that some are happy with a very large data loss for some areas of the planet. How much data loss will they accept on their own sector of the planet? Liz _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk