On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:37 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, we contributors are being treated with contempt alright, besides > not being asked what we contributors want, since this whole thing > started it's been nothing but dirty tricks to try and get the license > changed. No, JohnSmith, still you present a skewed vision. Every time OSM contributors have been asked, they have supported ODbL (or license change before ODbL had a name). All the way back to SotM Manchester. And all the way forward through polls and surveys and more SotM conferences. All the time, collaborative discussions and compromise. Every contributor will make their own choice to proceed or not. But still you accuse other OSM contributors of "dirty tricks". You claim your volume of edits or gas consumption as if it were something unusual to OpenStreetMap contributors. But then you import data without following the community import guidelines[1] And then you run 'bots without following the community automated edits guidelines[2] Not cool, JohnSmith. OpenStreetMap - It's Fun. It's Free. You can Help. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits/Code_of_Conduct _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
