2011/6/17 Dermot McNally <derm...@gmail.com>:
> On Friday, 17 June 2011, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer <o...@amen-online.de> wrote:

> I read your other mail on that topic. I don't personally have any
> objection to addressing weaknesses in the definition of "active
> contributor".


If we take the voting issues seriously we should also have a voting
system that is open (i.e. transparent, open source, registers
transactions, ...), breaks usernames down to natural persons (would
probably require external verification services or maybe a system like
CaCert where mappers can certify/authenticate each other by personal
contact and passport verification).

cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to