En relación a [L-I] Cuba,
el 28 Aug 00, a las 10:30, A.Wosni dijo:
> on Cuba:
>
> 1. while it is important to know how much popular backing the
> Castro-regime still has, this in itself does not prove any
> 'socislist'and/or 'workers state' character of the regime, of course.
[...]
> Things would be so easy if the bad guys were always disliked. I
> somewhere read that the Russian zar Ivan the Cruel was much liked by
> the people (at least they all broke out in tears when he had died).If
> Castro still has the support of the majority of the people (specially
> the working class) this may be more because of nationalist than of
> class sentiment.
Is the following an unfaithful translation?
(a) there is a Berlin Wall between both "sentiments"
(b) class sentiments are worthy of support, and nationalist
sentiments are unworthy of support.
Consequently, movements which are based on "nationalist sentiments"
are reactionary.
As a corollary, people in the Third World, who have this stubborn
tendency to be nationalists, are reactionary.
Final conclusion: let us try to explain people out of their mistake.
In the end, the result of all this is either deserved and navel-
gazing loneliness for the Left, or tremendous defeats (such as in
Bolivia, 1972) for the masses.
Anton, I am seriously afraid that you do not have the slightest idea
of what does the word "dialectic" mean. Not joking.
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
