> > > >> Are you interested if we propose a pull request with a new > >> calibration binary (with OpenCV optional at compile time)? > >> > >> I personally no. I do not believe in checkerboard calibrations > >> for reasons I have stated earlier. > > > > It could be nice to validate with tests instead of just > > "believing", isn't it? > > You cannot validate because this would mean to test all lenses. You > can only invalidate by showing that it doesn't work for one lens. I > want a reliable method, and this means to test the lens with the > settings with which it is later used.
Hugin has released an automatic calibration and now maintain its own database. Hugin release note: "The lensfun library has been removed as it did not fulfill our expectations. It has been replaced with our own camera and lens database which uses a data mining approach and operates automatically without user intervention." http://wiki.panotools.org/Calibrate_lens_gui Again more dispersion in the open source community.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
