On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:00 AM john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think emacs and pharo are extremely similar in scope. That is to say in > both cases you can (and are intended to) spend close to 100% of your time > within the computing environment. In emacs the features that help > facilitate this are dired, vc/magit, and term/shell-commands. > > I spend an enormous amount of my time in dired because it's just so well > integrated into the rest of emacs. [snip]] > > vc/magit/diff-hl and other features make version control seamless and > mostly painless. [snip] > > Leo is very much like Org. I use Org more like a Jupyter Notebook than > anything else. What I utilize most is Org-babel. [snip] Leo does quite a > bit of what Org does already, they just do things differently. > [snip] > If Leo had a multi-node body pane which reflected the indented > structure/view shown in the tree pane then it would function more similarly > to Org-mode than it does now. [snip]. > Many thanks for these comments. One of my goals for Leo is for it to have all the features in this discussion of emacs <https://realpython.com/emacs-the-best-python-editor/>. I am not going to rewrite Leo in elisp. Instead, I'm going to write the appropriate parts of emacs in python. Or use Almar Klein's code ;-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS3Y5sPGeS6M1shLaeCOG3Fw3GUDwf4by1PADEZ6fMAhMw%40mail.gmail.com.
