I am aware of that. I was giving an overview of why I chose LFS, where
I am in the LFS build process and where I intend to go with it. This
wasn't a call for help (for now), but was to say that there are new
people interested in the LFS project.

Excellent, Reece!  Welcome!  Yes, I think if anything, we aren't at a
spot where we need to be concerned about being boring.  Those of us
who have been dorking with LFS for a few years might observe the
project to be a bit quieter now, but this is the nature of software
development.  As Dan pointed out, now is the time to get more users
(testers) of this wonderful and maturing project.  It is reaching a
point where we can recommend to someone who has never used Linux to
actually start with LFS.  I wouldn't have even considered this as of
LFS 4.x, as it was very unstable.

If anything, we should be proud that we are making the project stable
to the point of being (almost) boring.  This will allow us to do some
more aggressive feature/package hunting, since our time is not just
spent on fixing current patches and toolchains.  Imagine having a BLFS
book with the table of contents the size of Debian's package list or
even bigger?  I am about to hand off a VERY stable LFS-6.2 -- BLFS-SVN
build to a buddy of mine that is a windows user, and I am confident he
will be comfortable enough with it, so much so he just might get a
real interest in this project.

To wrap up, I don't think that Randy's concerns about the project's
lull are unfounded, but at the same time, this shouldn't be depressing
at all.  It's sort of like a boy/girl becoming a man/woman.  The
change can be scary, but hey, you can go to a bar!  In LFS terms this
means more exciting features, even to the point of driving the
development process upstream to the package maintainers.  More and
more often nowadays I do a google search and find LFS results.  This
can't be a bad thing no matter how you look at it.  I think our
biggest challenge as we scale won't be getting testers/users or making
it stable, but remembering our roots (we aren't a distro, we're a
book) :)

Thanks to all.  I hope this can provide a little perspective.

Enjoy,

Craig Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to