On 4/15/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One other idea I had. What about adding a "-s" argument to statusproc
> so that it won't return any output? This is in line with the other
> *proc functions that silence they're output. This would allow me to
> not redirect output for this:
>
> statusproc process && do something that would bomb without the running process

Of course, I forgot to add the -s argument, statusproc -s process.

--
Dan
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to