On 4/15/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One other idea I had. What about adding a "-s" argument to statusproc > so that it won't return any output? This is in line with the other > *proc functions that silence they're output. This would allow me to > not redirect output for this: > > statusproc process && do something that would bomb without the running process
Of course, I forgot to add the -s argument, statusproc -s process. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page