On 4/15/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/11/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Attached is a series of patches that hopefully resolves all the issues > > below. The functions seem to work fine in my testing. I'll describe > > them a bit below. > > No one's said anything, so I'm committing these patches. I'm also > going to roll a new bootscripts tarball some time soon.
I'm rolling a new tarball now to get these fixes in the book. If anyone wonders why the tarball grew so much, it's because this has DJ's LSB style scripts in contrib/. > One other idea I had. What about adding a "-s" argument to statusproc > so that it won't return any output? This is in line with the other > *proc functions that silence they're output. This would allow me to > not redirect output for this: > > statusproc process && do something that would bomb without the running process I may address this later, but it's not high priority. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
