On Wednesday 04 July 2007 22:37:01 M.Canales.es wrote: > El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:29, Matthew Burgess escribió: > > I also think this is the way we should proceed. I'm not sure that we > > necessarily need to remove files that we don't require for a build of any > > of our books - in fact, keeping them around would probably make diffs > > between upstream and our downstream copy easier to understand. > > The files to be removed are almost all internationalization support files > (keeping only the few ones used for current translators) and the > highlighting/ files (used only by Saxon6). Thats around 5M of text files.
Oh, OK. That's pretty limited in scope then - seems to make sense to omit them from our repositories. > What I'm afraid is that if the stable DocBook-XSL release take another 5-6 > months we could start working on the Relax-NG migration before using the > nex-xsl code :-/ Well, I took a look at the Relax-NG stuff a while back and hit a bug in libxml2 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413248). That pretty much stops any work on migrating the stylesheets to be Relax-NG friendly. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
