Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > This isn't and should never be a showstopper for LFS. Since its > inception as a project, the LiveCD always _followed_ LFS releases. > People who follow development of LFS should be aware that a stable > LiveCD based on the just-released LFS book will be available in the near > future. >
The problem is that I can only release the minimal CD in the near future. The full CD is essentially untested, so a long delay is inevitable. I _will_ put a full CD with the 6.3 book on ums.usu.ru on the same day as the release or on the next day, depending on availability of the updated jhalfs - but I won't call this a stable CD. > If your goal is to avoid requests for support based on using the wrong > CD or people looking for a CD that doesn't exist, I have a couple of > suggestions: > Note that a maintained CD essentially doesn't exist. I will not develop it after the 6.3 release. > * Request that the LFS release announcement mention that a stable CD > will be released shortly. > See above. > * Recruit more LiveCD developers/maintainers > How do you propose to do this? I cannot recruit even testers. See - there was only one relevant reply to my request to test the CD on Intel hardware. The project is dead. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
