On 2/28/12 2:10 AM, Greg Schafer wrote:
> BTW, you might want to check your facts re the newlib switch. This
> sentence is clearly wrong:
>
> "This enables a very small standard C library that is included with GCC."

Indeed. newlib isn't shipped with GCC, the switch appears to just prep 
GCC to expect the functions newlib has. When Ryan first suggested this 
one, he may have intended it to force inhibit_libc variable to be true 
as per http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2006-08/msg00060.html

I'll test without the switch as it may no longer be necessary.

JH
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to