On 2/28/12 11:10 AM, Matt Burgess wrote: > It's a shame that configure switch is so-called. It sounds from your > description as if it really should be called '--without-libc' or > something similar, as it doesn't actually try to determine/use newlib.
Agreed. I almost prefer modifying gcc/Makefile.in to specifically use -Dinhibit_libc without the switch, because at least then it's very straightforward as to what we're doing. JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
