On 2/28/12 2:10 AM, Greg Schafer wrote: > IMHO > sysroot is fine for real cross compilation > sysroot not fine for hybrid cross/native scenarios a'la current LFS
When you discussed the situation requiring the startfiles revert patch with upstream they reviewed DIY's build process. Their answer, several times, was 'use sysroot': http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35532 > There seems to be a lot of additional hacks required to prevent stuff > being found on the host (check the diff). There might seem to be, but it's not really. The only new stuff is really the sysroot bit. The other changes in pass 1 gcc are really just things we were already doing in pass 2 and in the adjusting toolchain section to prevent hard-coded searching through /usr JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
